North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 71 - 80 of 30,350
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner: Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent: Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holland v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner: Markas L. Holland
Respondent: Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oladokun v. Kelly
as 5:2024ct03091
Plaintiff: Oladayo Oladokun
Defendant: Warden L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boyd v. USA
as 3:2024cv00383
Petitioner: Patrick Jerome Boyd
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rosado v. Langdon et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Luis Antonio Rosado, Jr.
Defendant: FNU Langdon, Cindy Hayes, Kevin Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arriaga v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00384
Petitioner: Angel Arriaga
Respondent: USA
Interested Party: USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent: NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner: Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. USA
as 5:2024cv00216
Petitioner: Hosea Loren Lewis
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Stout v. Richie
as 5:2024ct03090
Plaintiff: James Stout
Defendant: Sgt. Richie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFITH v. OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2024cv00313
Plaintiff: MELISSA ANN GRIFFITH
Defendant: OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?