US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,542
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Staples et al v. Yates et al
as 2:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Don Juan Staples and Deborah Lawson Staples
Defendant:
Jason Yates, James Tomasik, Yulanda Gancs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ross v. Bluefield Area Transit et al
as 1:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross
Defendant:
Bluefield Area Transit and John Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Short v. FBI, et al
as 2:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gene Short
Defendant:
FBI and DEA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gowings v. Clark et al
as 5:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Bruce Allen Gowings
Defendant:
Robyn Clark, Kayla Ransbottom, Pepper Arrowood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Staples, Bey v. Parsons et al
as 2:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Don Juan Staples, Bey
Defendant:
Lieutenant T. Parsons, Sargent Kevin Allen, W. M. Tanzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211 - Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams v. United States Treasury Department
as 2:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Lillie Mae Williams
Defendant:
United States Treasury Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
