Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 58,454
Wolfford v. Hyland, III
as 9:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
James Hyland, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolfford v. Ernestine
as 9:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
Julye Ernestine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Unknown Staff
as 24-40318
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Unknown Staff, Director FNU Parker, U S Government and others
Thomas v. Creuzot
as 24-10395
Plaintiff:
Deuntae Thomas, Estate/Cestui Qui Trust
Defendant:
John Coleman Creuzot, #05069200 14th Amendment US Corporate Citizen Acting as District Attorney, Dallas County, City of Dallas, Texas and others
Greer v. State of Texas
as 24-20190
Plaintiff:
Dennis W. Greer, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Texas and its Agents and Harris County Sheriff's Department and its Agents
Harvey v. Galveston Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harvey, Jr
Defendant:
Galveston Police Department and Officer L. Mearlon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizondo v. State Judge of the 38th District Court et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jaime Elizondo
Defendant:
State Judge of the 38th District Court and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Mr. Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hancock
Defendant:
Doctor FNU Bahramri, FNU Mr. Skinner and Marg. Stevas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boswell v. Huntsville Parole et al
as 6:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
John A. Boswell
Defendant:
Huntsville Parole, Carmella Jones, Michael Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aikens v. Rocket Mortgage
as 5:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Aikens
Defendant:
Rocket Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
