Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 38,133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
White v. Mills et al
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
John D. White
Defendant:
Dee Ann Mills and Danielle Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hadnot v. Lufkin ISD et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Mickey Hadnot
Defendant:
Lufkin ISD, Lynn Torres, Jay Jost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bradarich v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Mark Bradarich
Defendant:
Sheriff David Rhodes, Yavapai County Arizona and Yavapai County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bautista v. Humble ISD et al
as 4:2024cv01744
Plaintiff:
Judith Bautista
Defendant:
Humble ISD, Robert D Sitton, Robert Scarfo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Williams v. Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525] et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Gerrick Darell Williams
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525], Fleetline doing business as Dart Transit Company, Quantrez Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
