Sixth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 34,998
Reguli et al v. Hetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli and Wendy Hancock
Defendant:
Tracy Hetzel, Estate of Kimberly Helper, Mary Katherine Evins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (JRC) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (JRC), John Doe #2 (TJC), John Doe #3 (RKF) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cashbaugh et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cashbaugh, Christopher Daniels, Anthony Dexter and others
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of and Tony Moulatsiotis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
North
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jerry North
Defendant:
Village of West Milton, Doyle Wright, James Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilson v. Arrowood et al
as 2:2024cv11151
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Paul Arrowood and Logan Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bush v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2024cv11143
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bush
Defendant:
Oakland, County of and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herron v. Schafer et al
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Eric Herron
Defendant:
Michael Schafer, Unknown Fountain, T. Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hillman v. Gill et al.
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Brandon John Hillman
Defendant:
Joseph N. Gill, Tayler Glass, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clark v. Blueprint Investments, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Blueprint Investments, LLC, Brysod Anderson, Aaron McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
