Sixth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Boris Skudnov v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabin
as 10-5247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BORIS NICKOLAEVICH SKUDNOV
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CABINET FOR HEALTH & FAMILY SERVICES, Department for Community Based Services
Ability Center of Greater Toledo et al v. Lumpkin
as 3:2010cv00446
Defendant:
Douglas E. Lumpkin
Plaintiff:
Ability Center of Greater Toledo, Ability Center of Greater Toledo, Ability Center of Greater Toledo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wills et al v. Ahmed
as 2:2010cv10504
Plaintiff:
Michael Wills, Valerie Tarrant and Manal Hussein
Defendant:
Ismael Ahmed and Ismael Ahmed
Skudnov v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health & Family Services
as 1:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
Boris Nickolaevich Skudnov
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health & Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Schrader v. Olszewski et al
as 1:2009cv00991
Plaintiff:
Anita Schrader
Defendant:
Janet Olszewski and Stephen Fitton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Burkholder v. Lumpkin
as 3:2009cv01878
Plaintiff:
Rex Burkholder and Rex Burkholder
Defendant:
Douglas E. Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pat Thorpe v. Township of Clayton, et al
as 09-1935
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAT THORPE
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF CLAYTON, CHARLES MELKI, Officer, LYNN SABIN, Officer and others
Chande Crawley, et al v. Ismeal Ahmed, et al
as 09-1718
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHANDE CRAWLEY, PENNY CARSON and LINDA BIRMINGHAM
Plaintiff - Intervenor:
BRITTANY LOCKERT
Defendant - Appellant:
ISMEAL AHMED, Director of Michigan Department of Human Services and JANET OLSZEWSKI, Director of Michigan Department of Community Health
Crips et al v. Lodge
as 3:2009cv00265
Plaintiff:
John J. Crips and Julia M. Crips
Defendant:
Gina Lodge
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
