Sixth Circuit Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 543,856
Hunter v. Cunningham et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Theron Hunter
Defendant:
Unknown Cunningham, Unknown Gaskill, Unknown Felver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Bethany Lynn Hubbert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Watson v. Levy & Associates, LLC
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Watson
Defendant:
Levy & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dowdy v. Vantell et al
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Antwion Dowdy
Defendant:
Warden Vincent Vantell, Core Civic, Inc., f/n/u Cockrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canal Insurance Company v. MS Express, LLC
as 2:2024cv01969
Plaintiff:
Canal Insurance Company
Defendant:
MS Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Lochner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01964
Plaintiff:
Trisha Lochner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roskey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01968
Plaintiff:
Richard Roskey
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keller v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01965
Plaintiff:
Nadine Keller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Handeland v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
Daryl H. Handeland
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lee Taylor
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
