Seventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 26,109
Lake v. Carlson
as 3:2024cv50153
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Judy Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Elkhart County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Tekuarus L Gary
Defendant:
Elkhart County Sheriffs Department, Jeff Segal and Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Cornett et al
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Alex L. Hale
Defendant:
T Cornett, Henrich and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Elkhart County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Tervarus L Gary
Defendant:
Elkhart County Sheriffs Department, Jeff Segal and Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodland v. Meisner
as 2:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Corey Woodland
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kinikin, Jeremiah v. Tank
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah N. Kinikin
Defendant:
C.O. Tank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Johnson v. David Gomez, et al
as 24-1634
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID GOMEZ, Warden of Stateville, WENDY OLSEN, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Cooper, Demetrius v. Michlowski, Dr. et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Cooper
Defendant:
Dr. Michlowski, Tonya Wesner, Dr. Kerry Kuffenkan and others
Not Yet Classified:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuentes v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Joe Fuentes
Defendant:
Warden, Medical Providers and Transportation Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finnegan v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Defendant:
LeAnn Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
