US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 19,038
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00660
Petitioner: LONNIE WILLIAMS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARDNER v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00131
Petitioner: JALIEN GARDNER
Respondent: TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff: WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant: I.D.O.C, FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PANNELL v. SCHILDMEIR, ET AL
as 1:2024cv00654
Plaintiff: DAVID PANNELL
Defendant: RONALD SCHILDMEIR, AMANDA BRIDEGROOM and WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HATTON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00668
Petitioner: TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUTH-BRADLEY v. SIPICH et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff: JOSEPH JAMES RUTH-BRADLEY
Defendant: CARRIE SIPICH, DERRIK HOBBS, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. AKANDE et al
as 1:2024cv00667
Plaintiff: MARQUESE BERRY
Defendant: AKANDE, JAIL COMMANDER, ADEOJO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. USA
as 2:2024cv00133
Petitioner: KERRI MILLER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HANNA v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00134
Petitioner: STEPHEN HANNA
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CUNNINGHAM v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00662
Petitioner: KEVIN CUNNINGHAM
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?