US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 19,038
MULLIS v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00127
Petitioner:
BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Respondent:
T. PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRAFT v. SWEARINGEN et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CRAFT
Defendant:
BRYSON SWEARINGEN, BRADEN CROWLEY, STAN ROARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. MILBURG et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
LOREN CLYDE LEWIS
Defendant:
BRANDON MILBURG and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REYNOLDS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
LANDIS J. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE and THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEVELS v. COMMISSIONER et al
as 1:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
REKO LEVELS, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, DIRECTOR OF RELIGIOUS SERVICES, SHIPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDWINE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M. REDWINE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. VANIHEIL
as 2:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Respondent:
VANIHEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOYNER v. UNKNOWN OFFICER et al
as 1:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
NIGEL T. JOYNER
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICER, A. FENI, AKENADI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
