Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 30,364
STEWART v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00775
Petitioner:
ROBERT STEWART
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner:
Rickey R Armour
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Morales
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Morales
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. ACLU et al
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
MARION L. YOUNG, I
Defendant:
ACLU, KENNETH FAK and GAVIN M. ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
GILBERT, GORD, UNIT TEAM MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERDUE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY K. PERDUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Mayes
as 3:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Billy Asher Wilson
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00755
Petitioner:
OSCAR PEREZ
Respondent:
CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOTON v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MOTON
Defendant:
LISA HAMBLEN, MELISSA BAGENSKI, J. SHOWALTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
