U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 49,295
Frank Townsend, et al v. Bob Watson, et al
as 24-1926
Plaintiff:
Frank Townsend, Reverend, Lewis T. Daniels, Charlie P. Reedy and others
Defendant:
Bob Watson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of the El Dorado School District No. 15, a Public Body Corporate, El Dorado School District #15, Board of Education of the, Michael Meeks, Member, Board of Education, El Dorado School District No. 15 and others
Intervenor:
Arkansas Department of Education and Arkansas State Board of Education
Will LaClaire v. Teresa Bittinger, et al
as 24-1925
Plaintiff:
Will C. LaClaire
Defendant:
Teresa L. Bittinger and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
United States v. Corinthian Reese
as 24-1924
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Corinthian John-N Reese
Rosie Davis v. William Franks
as 24-1927
Plaintiff:
Rosie L. Davis
Defendant:
William Dale Franks
Intervenor:
Arkansas Department of Education, The and Arkansas State Board of Education, The
Gerald Locke, Sr. v. Brent Fluke, Warden, et al
as 24-1920
Petitioner:
Gerald D. Locke, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General of South Dakota
Lorenzo Taylor, Sr. v. Correctional Officer Langhor, et al
as 24-1918
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo P. Taylor, Sr.
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Langhor, Correctional Officer Michael, Sgt. Enlow and others
Gregg Colton v. Lime Rock Resources GP V, LP, et al
as 24-8006
Petitioner:
Gregg B. Colton, on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated persons
Respondent:
Lime Rock Resources GP V, LP, Lime Rock Resources III-A GP, LLC, Lime Rock Resources III-A, LP and others
United States v. Terry Campie
as 24-1901
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terry Marshall Campie
United States v. Phillip Rogers
as 24-1904
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Phillip Lanell Rogers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
