Eighth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 516
Kelly v. Hensel
as 0:2024cv01478
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Kelly
Defendant:
Kathy Hensel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Russell v. Le
as 8:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Sonia Russell
Respondent:
Hung Le
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Flournoy v. Estelle et al
as 4:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
LaSundra Flournoy
Defendant:
Brandon Estelle and Graceway Church
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Vitti Labs LLC et al v. The Regenerative Project, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Vitti Labs LLC, Vitti Corporate, LLC and Gold Prairie Distribution, LLC
Defendant:
The Regenerative Project, LLC d/b/a Platinum Biologics and Michael Beeben Russell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Humphrey v. Missouri State Highway Patrol
as 2:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Missouri State Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MacDermott v. Shelabarger
as 0:2024cv01234
Defendant:
Benjaman Shelabarger and Benjamin Shelabarger
Plaintiff:
Troy N. MacDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Gantman v. Farahan
as 0:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
David Gantman
Defendant:
Afshin "Alex" Farahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Loggins v. Cass County et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Loggins
Defendant:
Cass County and Heidi McLean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Stadheim v. Morlock-Reeves et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Travis John Stadheim
Defendant:
Rebecca Morlock-Reeves and State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Hedquist v. Bakken et al
as 0:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Christina Marie Hedquist
Defendant:
Kevin Lee Bakken and Tina Dell Vigessa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
