Ninth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 39,771
Legkobit v. O'Malley et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Sergey Legkobit
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Romo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00318
Plaintiff:
Johanna Isabel Romo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Stevens v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Pollen Moana Alohalani Stevens
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reeder v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Clayton E. Reeder
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Richard Godoy Magana v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Richard Godoy Magana
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cody v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05294
Plaintiff:
Brian J Cody
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(SS) Romo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Johanna Isabel Romo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Tran v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Them Tran
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Quinnett v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Diana Dee Quinnett
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Stump v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05280
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stump
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
