Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 230,856
(PC) Cross v. Kings County Sheriff et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lee Cross
Defendant:
Kings County Sheriff, Senior Dep. Schrieber, Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McDowell v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Giovanni McDowell
Defendant:
Steve Smith, Jeffrey Storey, Joseph Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Ruby et al
as 6:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Sidney V. Newton
Defendant:
Officer Ruby, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Martinez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Carlos Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wilson v. Molina et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Combs Wilson
Defendant:
C. Molina, J. Banania, B. Madrigal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reyes-Villanueva v. Pouge, et al.
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Michael Reyes-Villanueva
Defendant:
Tyson Poug, Gustavian, Debbie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall
as 3:2024cv02516
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Rayshaad Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
McNeil v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeil
Defendant:
William Gittere, Walter Romero, Tasheena Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
