Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 231,111
Caraffa #350727 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gonzalez v. Chappell et al
as 3:2024cv02737
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Kevin Chappell, Eleanore Adams, Brian Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv02741
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garner v. SVSP Warden et al
as 3:2024cv02751
Plaintiff:
Randall James Garner
Defendant:
SVSP Warden and C/O M. Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Clay et al
as 4:2024cv02739
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Jennie Clay, Patty Tyler and Monique
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Malone v. Williams
as 2:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Dominic Ronaldo Malone
Defendant:
Julie Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lopez v. Luhan et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Elijah Lopez
Defendant:
Luhan, Chavez, Pohovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Multnomah County Jail
as 3:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Raymond LaVaughn Grant
Defendant:
Multnomah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
