Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 231,139
(PC) Wilson v. Stronach
as 1:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Christina Stronach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Gregory v. Lundy
as 2:2024cv01323
Petitioner:
Charles Walter Gregory
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Judge v. Allred et al
as 2:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Rashaun Judge
Defendant:
David Kim Allred, Elisabeth Higgins and Allison Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howe #303244 v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
Charles Howe
Defendant:
Lupe Reyes, Christine Johnston, Catherine Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Cook et al
as 3:2024cv02770
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
Aaron Cook and Alison Pachynski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. The State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00878
Petitioner:
Wilbert Knight
Respondent:
The State of Nevada and Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Traylor v. Friend
as 2:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Abudu Imamu Traylor
Defendant:
Stanley Friend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborne v. Vincent et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Jack Lee Osborne
Defendant:
Capt. Vincent, Deputy Fittings, Deputy Whitmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capone v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Capone
Respondent:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re Smith
as 5:2024cv02761
Plaintiff:
Leslie Rosalee Smith
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
