Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 863
Rodriguez v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Pedro Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden William Reubart, Aaron D. Ford and Warden William Gittere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Shinn et al
as 3:2023cv08023
Petitioner:
Frank Winfield Anderson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Staci Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Ovante v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02003
Petitioner:
Manuel Ovante
Respondent:
David Shinn and Staci Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Murray Hooper v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-99012
Petitioner / Appellant:
MURRAY HOOPER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry, STACI IBARRA, Warden, Eyman Prison and RODNEY CARR, Warden, Florence Prison
Hooper v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01935
Petitioner:
Murray Hooper
Respondent:
David Shinn, Staci Ibarra and Rodney Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Pizzuto v. Richardson
as 1:2022cv00452
Petitioner:
Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noel Jackson v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-99011
Petitioner:
NOEL JACKSON
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
Douglas Oliver Kelly v. Ronald Broomfield
as 2:2022cv06460
Petitioner:
Douglas Oliver Kelly
Respondent:
Ronald Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
James Fayed v. Warden San Quentin State Prison
as 22-99010
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL FAYED
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON
Kevin Lisle v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99009
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN JAMES LISLE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART and AARON D. FORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
