U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 12,143
USA v. Ronald Champney
as 24-1363
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RONALD GRANT CHAMPNEY
Kenneth Reid v. Warden Canaan USP
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. REID
Defendant:
WARDEN CANAAN USP
LG Street v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1326
Plaintiff:
LG STREET
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Aquil Johnson v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1371
Plaintiff:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Carl Bell v. Kim Ardery, et al
as 24-1373
Plaintiff:
CARL EDWARD BELL
Defendant:
KIM ARDERY, Medical Care Supervisor/CHCA at SCI- Benner Township, MORRIS HOUSER, Superintendent, GEORGE LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Corrections and others
Frederico Bruno v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1349
Plaintiff:
FREDERICO BRUNO
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and PROSECUTOR HUDSON COUNTY
Michael Rivera v. New Castle County Police Department, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. RIVERA
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CORPORAL ANDREW ROSAIO, OFFICER JOSEPH MIHALYI and others
Keith Tolbert v. Mandy Sipple, et al
as 24-1346
Plaintiff:
KEITH C. TOLBERT
Defendant:
MANDY SIPPLE, ANN LEWIS, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Martin Jonassen, et al v. BOP, et al
as 24-1327
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MR. PERKINS
Rodrick Brayboy v. Kullner, et al
as 24-1331
Plaintiff:
RODRICK BRAYBOY
Defendant:
KULLNER, UNIT MANAGER, ZACHARY J. MOSLACK, CHIEF HEARING EXAMINER, APPEALS OFFICE, DAYNORWICZ, PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
