Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 809,423
Beckman, Russell v. Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation et al
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Russell Beckman
Defendant:
Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation and Director Timothy C. Samuelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lush, Stephen v. O'Leary, David
as 3:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
David O'Leary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McKinnie v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
John McKinnie
Defendant:
City of San Diego, San Diego Police Department, Officer Hoffstetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
LIA Network v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
LIA Network
Defendant:
J.R. Johnson, Randall H. Erben, Chris Flood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Marvin Johnson
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Salazar v. SHI International Corp
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Norma Salazar
Defendant:
SHI International Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
PENA et al v. CARDONA et al
as 5:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
JULIO PENA and NANCY PENA
Defendant:
CHIEF ROXANNE CARDONA, OFFICER J ORTIZ, CHAD COVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.G. v. County of Siskiyou et al
as 2:2024at00584
Plaintiff:
A. G.
Defendant:
County of Siskiyou, Jennifer Moody and Children First Foster Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
