Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 420,677
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03931
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00789
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01041
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sanders v. City of Miami Gardens et al
as 1:2015cv21971
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Marinez et al
as 1:2015cv04576
Plaintiff: Sherard Martin
Defendant: Davis Marinez, Sofia Gonzalez, Armando Chagoya and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
BARNES v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH INC.
as 1:2015cv00819
Plaintiff: ALETA BARNES
Defendant: INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH INC.
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Race)
Rodriguez-Arce v. Puerto Rico Ombud. Mgmt. Off., et al
as 15-1593
Plaintiff - Appellee: NOEMI RODRIGUEZ-ARCE
Defendant - Appellant: THE PUERTO RICO OMBUDSMAN OFFICE, PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN FOR THE ELDERLY, and Retired Persons, SECRETARY OF JUSTICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Rodriguez-Arce v. Puerto Rico Ombud. Mgmt. Off., et al
as 15-1598
Plaintiff - Appellant: NOEMI RODRIGUEZ-ARCE
Defendant - Appellee: THE PUERTO RICO OMBUDSMAN OFFICE, PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN FOR THE ELDERLY, and Retired Persons, SECRETARY OF JUSTICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Frank McCall, Jr. v. David Stone, et al
as 15-30466
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK L. MCCALL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID E. STONE, BOBBY L. CULPEPPER, PAMELA P. MITCHELL and others
Veronica Hernandez v. City of Lubbock Texas, et al
as 15-10464
Plaintiff - Appellant: VERONICA HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF LUBBOCK TEXAS, ADAM GARRETT FREEMAN
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.