District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 101 - 110 of 90,135
Dominion Partners LLC v. Niles Bolton Associates Inc
as 2:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Dominion Partners LLC
Defendant:
Niles Bolton Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Vestal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
James Vestal
Defendant:
MD Karen Ballard Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 233 Civil Actions or Proceedings Against Commissioned Officers or Employees
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
Vernon v. Deramus et al
as 2:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Michael Chad Vernon
Defendant:
Deramus, Bohackle, Jude Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bynum (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Williams
Defendant:
Mason Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00488
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Byrd, Derek Junior Adams, Jeffrey O'Brien Anglim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
