District Court Cases in Arkansas
Cases 1 - 10 of 65,582
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wilder v. Cestui Que Trust
as 4:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Craig Bernard Wilder
Defendant:
Cestui Que Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chenault v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James C Chenault
Defendant:
S Williams and Pritcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Turnkey Health
as 4:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Miller
Defendant:
Turnkey Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lee
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tennessee, State of et al v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Tennessee, State of, Arkansas, State of, Alabama, State of and others
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Burke v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Jared J. Burke
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Granado v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Joe Granado
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
