Illinois Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 537
Phillips v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 3:2019cv00265
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Joshua G. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Whitworth v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2019cv00221
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Lori C Whitworth
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Stamps v. Amtrak
as 1:2019cv00914
Plaintiff:
Darlene Stamps
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation Amtrak, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilbert v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2019cv00804
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Michael Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cannon v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2019cv00086
Plaintiff:
Wade A. Cannon
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Beaston v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2018cv02082
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and American Electric Power Service Corporation
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Beaston
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Winter v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv06722
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Walter Winter
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Kuraszek v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2018cv05439
Plaintiff:
Scott Kuraszek
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Soo Line Railroad Co
as 1:2018cv05231
Plaintiff:
Jose M Rodriguez
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jefferson v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation
as 1:2018cv03555
Plaintiff:
Jetun Jefferson
Defendant:
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
