US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 702
Glynn v. Cigar Cigar LLC
as 4:2020cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bryan Glynn
Defendant:
Cigar Cigar LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lafayette Venetian Blind, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Blinds To Go (US) Inc
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Venetian Blind, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Sadowski v. Real Clear Holdings, LLC
as 3:2020cv00215
Defendant:
Real Clear Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Jairaj v. Gray Television, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00156
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jairaj
Defendant:
Gray Television, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Matula v. The Triple H Magazine, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00071
Plaintiff:
George Matula
Defendant:
The Triple H Magazine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Shield Exteriors Inc v. 4Ever Metal Roofing LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00064
Defendant:
John Estabrook, John Estabrook dba Local2Online, Travis Sliger and others
Plaintiff:
Shield Exteriors Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Williamsburg Furniture, Inc. v. Lippert Components, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Lippert Components Inc
Plaintiff:
Williamsburg Furniture, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Backstage of Indiana LLC
as 2:2020cv00010
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., THE MUSIC FORCE, LORD AND WALKER PUBLISHING and others
Defendant:
BACKSTAGE OF INDIANA, LLC d/b/a BACKSTAGE ON BROADWAY, MARCELL JACKSON and Backstage of Indiana LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
CravinVapes LLC v. McClellan et al
as 1:2019cv00546
Defendant:
Indiana Vapes LLC and Michael McClellan
Plaintiff:
CravinVapes LLC
Not Classified By Court:
John Whiteleather
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Tatuyou L.L.C. v. One Ink Seven LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01186
Defendant:
One Ink Seven LLC and Robert F. Smead
Plaintiff:
Tatuyou L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
