US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 61 - 70 of 7,926
MITCHELL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00035
Petitioner: LAKESHA MITCHELL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KREILEIN v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv00185
Petitioner: ALAN KREILEIN
Respondent: MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00184
Petitioner: RAYMOND C. WHITE
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00167
Petitioner: RENALD WILLIAMS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL
as 1:2024cv00140
Petitioner: KENDALL JOHNSON
Respondent: FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRANCE v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00026
Petitioner: DESHALON FRANCE
Respondent: J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00022
Petitioner: SECUNDO WILLIAMS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
TURNER v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00023
Petitioner: BERNARD TURNER
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GAINES v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00021
Petitioner: ALLEN GAINES, JR.
Respondent: J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
STAPERT v. STATE
as 1:2024cv00119
Petitioner: ASHLEY STAPERT
Respondent: STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?