Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 11,855
OWENS v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00104
Petitioner: WILLIAM OWENS
Respondent: PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PARKS v. KALLIS
as 2:2024cv00098
Petitioner: DARRELL PARKS
Respondent: S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner: ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00100
Petitioner: TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00101
Petitioner: TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00102
Petitioner: TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARTON v. DANKS
as 3:2024cv00061
Petitioner: TYLER CAINE BARTON
Respondent: JONATHAN DANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Hawk v. Indiana Attorney General We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00259
Petitioner: Scotty Lee Van Hawk and Scotty Van Hawk
Respondent: Indiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DURHAM v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00538
Petitioner: DARRELL DURHAM
Respondent: EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. REAGEL
as 1:2024cv00511
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER WOODS
Respondent: REAGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?