Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 11,856
Lewis v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Darwin Lewis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HANKTON v. WADDS
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
ALKHALIQ HANKTON
Respondent:
WADDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GAUVIN v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
MICHELLE GAUVIN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GAUVIN v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00342
Petitioner:
MICHELLE GAUVIN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOLFORD v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
MARK WOLFORD
Respondent:
WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Malloch v. Indiana Attorney General
as 1:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Steven E Malloch
Respondent:
Indiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brazier v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
Kevin Brazier and Kevin Dashawn Demarcus Brazier Jr III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Brion B Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Brion B Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACOBS v. WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JACOBS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
