Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 121 - 130 of 11,880
Cochran v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00121
Petitioner: Michael J Cochran, Sr and Michael Cochran, Sr
Respondent: Warden
Not Yet Classified: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ackles v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00118
Petitioner: Robert Ackles
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PITTMAN v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2024cv00042
Petitioner: STEVEN PITTMAN, JR.
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MASCHO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00241
Petitioner: ADRIAN MASCHO
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buckley v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00097
Petitioner: Jeffery Buckley
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHUMPERT v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00040
Petitioner: REGINALD L. SHUMPERT
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robinson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner: Carlos Robinson
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simbeck v. Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner: Rocky Dwight Simbeck
Respondent: Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAUDENBUSH v. FOX
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner: BRAD RAUDENBUSH
Respondent: C. FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MITCHELL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00035
Petitioner: LAKESHA MITCHELL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?