Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 141 - 150 of 11,883
Vaughans v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00070
Petitioner: Eddie Vaughans
Respondent: Warden
Not Yet Classified: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00022
Petitioner: SECUNDO WILLIAMS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
TURNER v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00023
Petitioner: BERNARD TURNER
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GAINES v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00021
Petitioner: ALLEN GAINES, JR.
Respondent: J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
STAPERT v. STATE
as 1:2024cv00119
Petitioner: ASHLEY STAPERT
Respondent: STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crain v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00052
Petitioner: Durell T Crain
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NUNLEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Petitioner: WALTER J. NUNLEY
Respondent: STEVE KALLIS, BRADLEY HAMMOND, ROBERT ORR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harrold v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00043
Petitioner: Shane A Harrold and Shane Harrold
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JORDAN v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00078
Petitioner: NIKOLAS M. JORDAN
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tidwell v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00031
Petitioner: Loren Wayne Tidwell
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?