US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,792
Caldwell v. Luster et al
as 5:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Karl Jason Caldwell
Defendant:
Deputy Ron Luster and Lincoln County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Perusse v. Barstow Community Hospital
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Kathy Perusse
Defendant:
Barstow Community Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Blue Isle Home-Style Restaurant & Bar, LLC et al v. Winchester Country Club
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Blue Isle Home-Style Restaurant & Bar, LLC and Rawle Sylvester Somersall, Sr.
Defendant:
Winchester Country Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kallmeyer v. Mathews
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alexander Kallmeyer
Defendant:
Samuel Mathews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Blakeman
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Steven Rogers
Defendant:
Gina Blakeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
