US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,797
Blue Isle Home-Style Restaurant & Bar, LLC et al v. Winchester Country Club
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Blue Isle Home-Style Restaurant & Bar, LLC and Rawle Sylvester Somersall, Sr.
Defendant:
Winchester Country Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kallmeyer v. Mathews
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alexander Kallmeyer
Defendant:
Samuel Mathews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Blakeman
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Steven Rogers
Defendant:
Gina Blakeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Holliman v. Stanton et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
David Holliman
Defendant:
Steve Stanton, Stanton Homes, LLC. and Zachary Stayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Doe v. Taylor et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Reagan Taylor, Jailer Steve Tussey, Unknown Deputy Jailers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warick v. Newsome et al
as 7:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Gary Warick
Defendant:
Dusty Newsome, Mr. Symshack, John Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
