District Court Cases in Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 94,827
Moran v. John Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Ryan Moran
Defendant:
John Doe and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. doing business as FedEx Ground
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Whatley v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Samuel Whatley
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keys v. Presbyterian Children's Home and Services et al
as 4:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Presbyterian Children's Home and Services and Laurencia Ford Stikes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Criner v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Phillip Criner
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NRRM, LLC v. Endurance Warranty Services, LLC
as 4:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
NRRM, LLC
Defendant:
Endurance Warranty Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Malcolm v. Wardrip et al
as 4:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Felicia Malcolm
Defendant:
Junior Wardrip and VRC Companies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cierpiot v. Westrock Services, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Lucas Cierpiot
Defendant:
Westrock Services, LLC, Jason Hook and Rex Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Antonia Johnson
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Winegarner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Melissa Jean Winegarner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.