US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Malic v. Lennox Industries, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Adin Malic
Defendant:
Lennox Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pavon v. ClarkDietrich Engineering Services, LLC
as 4:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rojas Pavon
Defendant:
ClarkDietrich Engineering Services, LLC and Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family Medical Leave Act
Bradley v. Kirkwood School District
as 4:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Justin Bradley
Defendant:
Kirkwood School District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Westermayer v. Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company
as 2:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Scot Westermayer
Defendant:
Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family Medical Leave Act
Mitchell v. Southeast Hospital
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Angelia Mitchell
Defendant:
Southeast Hospital doing business as Southeast Health
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Foster v. Saia Logistics Services, LLC
as 4:2022cv00915
Plaintiff:
Rodney Foster
Defendant:
Saia Logistics Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family Medical Leave Act
Laird v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Dustin Laird
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family Medical Leave Act
Henley v. MHM Support Services
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Laura Copeland Henley
Defendant:
MHM Support Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Filius v. Missouri Department of Corrections
as 4:2021cv01483
Plaintiff:
Michael Filius
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Cissell v. Penn National Gaming, Inc.
as 4:2021cv01023
Plaintiff:
Katrina Cissell
Defendant:
Penn National Gaming, Inc. doing business as Hollywood Casino St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
