US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 91 - 100 of 37,813
Kerian v. Panorama Mortgage Group, LLC
as 5:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Ryan Kerian
Defendant:
Panorama Mortgage Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hernandez v. USA
as 7:2024cv00442
Petitioner:
Teresa Valdez Hernandez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al - DO NOT FILE ANY DOCUMENTS IN THIS CASE. ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE DOCKETED IN 5:24-CT-3139-FL.
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Bennett, Theodore Benjamin Lee, Anthony Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Billy Lane, Jr and Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al
as 5:2024ct03139
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Bennett, Theodore Benjamin Lee, Anthony Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
John Robert Morgan
Defendant:
United States of America
Payton v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Marvin Christopher Payton
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Eagal v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Eagal
Defendant:
United States of America
Fitch et al v. Tyrrell County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Joyce Sykes Fitch, Mark Mixon, Sherryreed Robinson and others
Defendant:
Tyrrell County Board of Commissioners, Nathan Everett, Nina Griswell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
