US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,301
Hernandez v. Stein et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ and RA SAADI LENNOX HERNANDEZ EL
Respondent:
JOSHUA H. STEIN, JAMIE BULLARD and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AZAR EL v. CABARRUS COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL doing business as JERIMY LOVE
Respondent:
CABARRUS COUNTY, CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL, MIKE DOWNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ELLIS v. GORDER
as 1:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Respondent:
R. VAN GORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LETTERLOUGH v. NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00284
Petitioner:
DERRICK DERRAIL LETTERLOUGH
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
ANTONIO DEVON HENDERSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BAKER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
JULIUS WAYNE BAKER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BRADY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
JOE LOUIS BRADY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
KERR v. USA
as 1:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
NORMAN ALAN KERR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VELEZ v. USA
as 1:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALAN VELEZ, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCGILL v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
