North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,599
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, KELLYCE HEBERT and others
C.M. v. DAVIDSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
C.M.
Defendant:
DAVIDSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and ERIC R. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frederick v. Propst et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michel Frederick
Defendant:
Jon Propst and City of Lincolnton, NC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murdock Ready Mix Concrete v. Ironplanet, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Murdock Ready Mix Concrete
Defendant:
Ironplanet, Inc., Jake Lawson, Brian Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. Nash County Board Education
as 5:2024cv00258
Defendant:
Nash County Board Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Nash County Board of Education et al
as 5:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Nash County Board of Education, Daniel Colvin, Steven Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gunter v. US DOJ et al
as 5:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Angela Dell Gunter
Defendant:
US DOJ, NC SBI and NC FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chase v. Hargett
as 5:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Martha Chase
Defendant:
Hon. Cedric J Hargett and Unknown Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. McFadden et al
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Walker
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden and Mecklenburg County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McClary v. Worldwide Clinical Trials, Inc. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 5:24-CV-227-D-KS
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Donita McClary
Defendant:
Worldwide Clinical Trials, Inc. and Marie Simerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
