North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 4,597
Turner v. State of North Carolina Pitt County et al
as 7:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anthony Turner
Defendant:
State of North Carolina Pitt County, Verna Donnelly, Sharon Rochelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Poole v. Hawkins
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dallas C. Poole, Sr.
Defendant:
Carey Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carroway et al v. Cepco Management Services, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Carl Carroway, Lisa Walker Young, Mary Ryan Shepard and others
Defendant:
Cepco Management Services, LLC and Lantana Crossing HOA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lasorsa v. Bell
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Lasorsa
Defendant:
James Edward Bell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Paris v. BJ Inspection Inc. DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE NO. 5:24-CV-28-M-KS.
as 4:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Angie Paris
Defendant:
BJ Inspection Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cobbs v. McMahon ****
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Rodney E. Cobbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Edward McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cobbs v. McMahon
as 5:2024ct03012
Plaintiff:
Rodney E. Cobbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Edward McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Messer v. Starbucks Corporation
as 7:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Messer
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Best v. Apollo Funds
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Timothy Best
Defendant:
Apollo Funds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Williams v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg, Johnny Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
