US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 11,739
ZERUTH v. USA
as 2:2024cv00520
Petitioner:
JUSTIN ZERUTH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ZERUTH v. USA
as 2:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
JUSTIN ZERUTH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
NELSON v. LAUREL et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRIAN NELSON
Defendant:
SECRETARY HARRY LAUREL, JORGE DOMINICIS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCULLEN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCULLEN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE and SECRETARY DR. HARRY LAUREL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PATEL v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
KENI GAUTAMBHAI PATEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TONY BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SGRO v. BANKS
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SGRO
Defendant:
SERGEANT J. BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IGLESIAS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
DAVIS IGLESIAS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, MS. KOIS and S. LONGSTRETH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ANTHONY v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
SCOTT ANTHONY
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RUPERT v. PROGAR et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
JODI LYNN RUPERT
Respondent:
DAVE PROGAR, TIM RUPERT, DISGUISED PAROLE OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. STAWIARSKI
as 2:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
William Patrick Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
