Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Poston v. Aramark Business Facilities, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00144
Defendant:
Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., Aramark Business Facilities, LLC and Hamilton County, Ohio
Plaintiff:
Scott Poston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris et al v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00311
Defendant:
John Doe Number One and Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Plaintiff:
James L. Morris and Sandra Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Loboy v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00083
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East LP, John Doe, John Doe Managers and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia Loboy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00459
Defendant:
John Carter, Carter Brothers, LLC, Carter Brothers Aramark Integrated Facilities Management, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Derek LaVonn Berry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harris v. Aramark Incorporation et al
as 2:2017cv00872
Plaintiff:
Herman Harris, Jr
Defendant:
Aramark Incorporation, Brad Gillespie, Timothy Shoop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Papushak v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02034
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Katheryn Papushak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nice v. Velez et al
as 1:2017cv01062
Defendant:
Sgt. Kathryn Bieber, Armour, Warden Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla Nice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargrove v. Abrams et al
as 1:2017cv01045
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Defendant:
Abrams, Aramark, Gary C Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
