Cases 41 - 50 of 37,717
Williams v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03124
Plaintiff:
Jasper Williams
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawkins v. Thompson et al
as 5:2024ct03123
Plaintiff:
Darnell Lamar Dawkins
Defendant:
Captain Tanesha Thompson, Captain Powell Wendell, Sergeant Dunia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manglik v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Amit Manglik
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hensley v. Engler et al
as 5:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Jason Hensley
Defendant:
John A. Engler, Megan E. Gooding, North Carolina Medical Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Moorhead v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Mark W Moorhead
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Macon v. Morton et al
as 5:2024ct03116
Plaintiff:
Cory Montae Macon
Defendant:
Warden Morton, Michael Russell, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mebane v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03122
Plaintiff:
Rashan A. Mebane
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Marc McPherson, Jason Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Livesay v. O'Malley DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE # 5:24-CV-272-D-RJ.
as 4:2024cv00068
Defendant:
April D. Livesay and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
