Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 11 - 20 of 23,901
CLOSNER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00411
Petitioner: TERRY JAMES CLOSNER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
FLOYD et al v. CAMPBELL et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff: Ashton Michelle Floyd and Stewart Floyd
Defendant: Christopher Campbell and Nolan Logging & Chipping, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
MOLINA v. AHP CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff: ALMA MOLINA
Defendant: AHP CONSTRUCTION, LLC, CHRONICLE HOLDINGS, LLC, L.P. ARMADA HOFFLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00399
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HOWARD v. USA
as 1:2024cv00412
Petitioner: BYRON KEITH HOWARD
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TISDALE v. VANGORDER
as 1:2024cv00408
Petitioner: IVORY JOE TISDALE
Respondent: VANGORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. ISHEE
as 1:2024cv00413
Petitioner: SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent: TODD ISHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCALLISTER v. NAPH CARE et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff: ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant: NAPH CARE, MS. CORRELL, MS. COWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALLWOOD v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff: LAMARQUIS SMALLWOOD
Defendant: DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. SAMPSON, SRG MS. LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff: JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant: LT. O.I.C., SLONG, K. FINKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?