Cases 31 - 40 of 68,817
Ortiz v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00331
Petitioner:
Joseph Ortiz
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Schaefer
as 3:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
Malcom Rashad Pittman
Respondent:
Office of George E. Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichols v. Whilby et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Keith Nichols
Defendant:
P. Whilby, G. Shepherd and Clint Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kendall Bowen
Defendant:
Deputy Billy Davis, D. Williams, Lt. Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Shawntelle Ellis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sissoko v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Vivian Sissoko, o/b/o S.E.S, a minor
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Malik v. United States Department of State
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Crystal Malik
Defendant:
United States Department of State
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Tate & Hill, Inc. v. Sanford Federal, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Tate & Hill, Inc.
Defendant:
Sanford Federal, Inc. d/b/a Talon Veteran Services, Inc. and Markel Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Edwards v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Felicia Edwards
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and WalMart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mueller v. Butcher
as 1:2024cv00828
Plaintiff:
Kurt D. Mueller
Defendant:
Daniel Butcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
