Cases 21 - 30 of 22,855
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mitchell et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Demericon Alex Williams
Defendant:
Phillip Mitchell and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Battle v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brunson v. Green et al
as 5:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Albert Brunson
Defendant:
Green, Howell and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Tallapoosa County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCrory v. Hamm (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Charles McCrory
Defendant:
John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reese v. Huggins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Cedric Anthony Reese
Defendant:
Thomas Huggins and Blake Turman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jamie Mills
Defendant:
John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBrahl-Daniels v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00519
Petitioner:
Leatrice Malika DeBrahl-Daniels
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Horton v. Richerson et al
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant:
Kelly Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
