Cases 41 - 50 of 156,094
Ross v. Bangor Savings Bank, et al
as 24-1445
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS and BRIENNA ROWE
Defendant:
BANGOR SAVINGS BANK, TRESTEN BERGERON, Branch Manager of Skowhegan Branch and GABRIELLE CAMPBELL, Assistant Branch Manager of Skowhegan Branch
Seguin v. Rhode Island Office of Child Support Services, et al
as 24-1451
Plaintiff:
MARY SEGUIN
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, in its official capacity, KEVIN TIGHE, in his individual and official capacity, MONIQUE BONIN, in her individual and official capacity and others
Michael E. Gumprecht, LLC v. Groff et al
as 3:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Gumprecht, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Groff and Wesley Decatur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Morris et al. v. Travisono, et al.
as 1:1969cv04192
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
LAZ KARP Associates, LLC v. Dean Auto Collision Center, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
LAZ KARP Associates, LLC
Defendant:
Dean Auto Collision Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
US v. Pontz
as 24-1438
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
KENNETH PONTZ
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WILMINGTON TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. BOOTH
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
WILMINGTON TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
JAMES W BOOTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
