Cases 51 - 60 of 112,152
GRIPPALDI v. UNITED HEALTHCARE OPTUM SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
SHONNA GRIPPALDI
Defendant:
UNITED HEALTHCARE OPTUM SERVICES and KATRINA THORB
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE et al v. WOMACK CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION
as 1:2024cv00837
Plaintiff:
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
WOMACK CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
HUGHES v. HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA R. HUGHES
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE et al v. SCHILLI PLASTERING COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSIONFUNDS,
Defendant:
SCHILLI PLASTERING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Davis v. American Senior Communities, LLC
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
American Senior Communities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Taebel v. NFL
as 3:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
NFL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
