Cases 41 - 50 of 99,873
Miller v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Justin Ray Miller
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Judge Barry Tidwell and Melissa Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Lakeith Humphrey
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Mobley v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5477
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MOBLEY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN F. J. BOWERS, FCI Memphis and others
Mark Gooding v. Parole Board, et al
as 24-1438
Petitioner:
MARK ANTHONY GOODING
Respondent:
PAROLE BOARD and MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
Strong #834816 v. Sandborn et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Christopher Strong #834816
Defendant:
Unknown Sandborn, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. USA
as 2:2024cv11293
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wartley #462928 v. Hoffman et al
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
John Wartley #462928
Defendant:
Unknown Hoffman and Marsha Nurkala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #236300 v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Williams #236300
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Connie Horton, James Corrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez #228832 v. Healthcare Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Luciano Vasquez #228832
Defendant:
Healthcare Bureau, Michigan Department of Corrections, St. Louis Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayward v. USA
as 1:2024cv00872
Petitioner:
Christian Hayward
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
