Cases 31 - 40 of 10,422
HINES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
SHARON L HINES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
PARKER v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
CHAD PARKER
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, JAIL COMMANDER, DUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
SIGNUM, LLC et al v. INDIANAPOLIS ORGANIC LAWN CARE, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
SIGNUM, LLC and NATURALAWN OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS ORGANIC LAWN CARE, INC., DONALD HARVEY, DEBORAH CASEY-HARVEY and others
Mead v. Officer et al
as 1:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Dean Arthur Mead
Defendant:
B. Deckard Officer, BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and Monroe County Sheriff Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WOODS v. REAGEL
as 1:2024cv00511
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WOODS
Respondent:
REAGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MICHAELS v. USA
as 4:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
THOMAS WAYNE MICHAELS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
