Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 81 - 90 of 71,442
LAMPE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00908
Plaintiff: DEVAN LAMPE
Defendant: TRENT ALLEN and CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESTES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00226
Plaintiff: CODY ESTES
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00920
Petitioner: MARVIN LOVE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LAGUNAS v. OLD NATIONAL BANK
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff: RAFAEL LAGUNAS
Defendant: OLD NATIONAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PETRO v. MENARD, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff: LEO PETRO
Defendant: MENARD, INC. and MENARDS STORE #3180 AT COLUMBUS INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BADGER DAYLIGHTING CORP. v. Rutherford We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00912
Plaintiff: BADGER DAYLIGHTING CORP.
Defendant: Shannon Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
COLLINS v. ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS
as 1:2024cv00911
Plaintiff: ERNEST COLLINS
Defendant: ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr - Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
ISBY v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00905
Petitioner: AARON ISBY
Respondent: CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PERKINS v. LANE et al
as 1:2024cv00907
Plaintiff: JAMES PERKINS
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER LANE and BARTHOLOMEW CO. JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv00906
Plaintiff: AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant: ARAMARK, GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?