Cases 11 - 20 of 51,243
OWENS v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
ROBERT OWENS
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Santana v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.
as 2:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Santana
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thompson v. Garvey Manor Nursing Home
as 3:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Mae Thompson
Respondent:
Garvey Manor Nursing Home
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
WILLIAMS v. WASHINGTON
as 1:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00166
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
BAEZ v. MCCULLOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BAEZ
Defendant:
STACI M. MCCULLOUGH, JONATHAN MATSON and TWELVE JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
FAYDRA HUNTER
Defendant:
COMPASS GROUP USA, INC. doing business as CHARTWELLS DINING SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PA v. HUCKESTEIN MECHANICAL LLC
as 2:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PA
Defendant:
HUCKESTEIN MECHANICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
